Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2012 12:43:16 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jean-S=E9bastien_P=E9dron?= <dumbbell@FreeBSD.org> To: Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [rfc] bind curthread to target cpu for _CST change notification Message-ID: <50B9ED54.4010809@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <50B9E2CB.3010002@FreeBSD.org> References: <50AE3C66.2050207@FreeBSD.org> <1353872249.20189.3.camel@powernoodle> <50B77F4B.8070701@FreeBSD.org> <50B8951D.1000609@FreeBSD.org> <50B9C7B6.1040306@FreeBSD.org> <50B9C968.70804@FreeBSD.org> <50B9CACB.8030903@FreeBSD.org> <50B9E2CB.3010002@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On 01.12.2012 11:58, Andriy Gapon wrote: > on 01/12/2012 11:15 Jean-Sébastien Pédron said the following: >> On 01.12.2012 10:10, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>> on 01/12/2012 11:02 Jean-Sébastien Pédron said the following: >>>> By the way, should _CST appear in a dump from acpidump(8)? >>> >>> Yes, it depends... :-) _CST could be defined in a dynamically loadable >>> region. If you do not see _CST in the DSDT but see Load() calls, then >>> that's the most likely explanation. >> >> How do I see these Load() calls? Are they related to the ACPI_LV_LOAD level >> in debug.acpi.level? > > acpidump -dt > somefile.asl > vi somefile.asl > /Load > > :-) Right :) Yes, there're Load() calls: ... Load (CST0, HC0) ... Thank you! -- Jean-Sébastien Pédron [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlC57VoACgkQa+xGJsFYOlOCBgCglrAtK/1kTQbCJg4WEtv+yvUM cpIAn0E7qSxj8V0W6WhxXmy68fjjlTdP =3xew -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50B9ED54.4010809>