Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 04:59:33 -0400 From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental" Message-ID: <CAGFTUwMLyqog_xfMSd5PvwPBeRhOm62PNBHEO86M7AsPLyoQgw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Peter Holm wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:57:16PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 06:20:03PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > > > Got a "panic: Not a vnode object" quite fast: > > > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pho/stress/log/kostik441.txt > > > > Ah, yes, this is an assertion that was added in the r209702. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/misc/tmpfs.7.patch > > Looks good. The mmap(2) test doesn't panic any more, nor does any of > the other TMPFS tests I have. Is this patch under consideration for inclusion in 9.0? b.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGFTUwMLyqog_xfMSd5PvwPBeRhOm62PNBHEO86M7AsPLyoQgw>