Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 01:16:37 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: Steven Hartland <smh@freebsd.org> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r270759 - in head/sys: cddl/compat/opensolaris/kern cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs vm Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1408290112500.67367@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <899BF203A6C64F3D8C8902F371D9DA79@multiplay.co.uk> References: <201408281950.s7SJo90I047213@svn.freebsd.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1408290055050.67367@woozle.rinet.ru> <899BF203A6C64F3D8C8902F371D9DA79@multiplay.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014, Steven Hartland wrote: > > Thank you, and also Karl and Devin for this work! > > > > Is this change applicable to stable/9? I suppose, pretty large base of users > > could benefit from this. > > Its very likely applicable to stable/9 although I've never used 9 myself, > we jumped from 9 direct to 10. > > My target for this is to make the cutoff for 10.1 freeze. > > I'll MFC to 9 and possibly 8 as well at that time if relavent. No rush for other stable branches, surely; also, we're at the EoL (EoS at least) for stable/8 -- but if the changeset is not too harsh I see no reason not to merge it down there. As I @work have some loaded machines with ZFS base on at least 9 (while not really memory-loaded, not more than 32G -- but sometimes rather heavy loaded with userbase apps), I would be glad to test changesets if it's feasible. Thanks again! -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1408290112500.67367>