Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2003 19:29:15 -0700 (PDT) From: xiong jinshan <xiongjinshan@yahoo.com> To: deischen@freebsd.org Cc: threads@freebsd.org Subject: Re: About the kse signal process Message-ID: <20030701022915.50290.qmail@web80503.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10306302207020.26781-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jun 2003, xiong jinshan wrote: > > It received the SIGSEGV before the main() when I > > linked with libc_r;(. > > I think you have something screwed up somewhere. > How did you compile and link it? Yes, it maybe my fault. If I link libc_r with static, it works correctly. If I link it with dynamic, segv occurs. If I not linked c_r, th_func() couldn't received the alarm. Why must it be linked with static mode? Does it mean the native c library in release 5.1 not reentrant? > > -- > Dan Eischen > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month! http://sbc.yahoo.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030701022915.50290.qmail>