Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:12:29 +0000 From: Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org, postmaster@freebsd.org Subject: Re: spam detection notification Message-ID: <20060317001229.GR36929@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <200603161902.56596.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> References: <C03FAAB7.A971%ceri@submonkey.net> <200603161902.56596.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--SvyA5ywaG/v2A5dH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 07:02:56PM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> ?????? 16 ???????? 2006 18:52, Ceri Davies ?? ????????:
> > There was a glitch and everything sent to the bugs database was flagged=
as
> > spam. ?This has been fixed.
>=20
> So, is my PR logged in or do I have to resend it?
If you sent it in the last two days, and received the auto-response with
the PR number, then its logged. Otherwise it may have gone astray at
another point in the processing.
Basically, this problem merely meant that you would have received the
"that tasted like spam" autoresponse and there would have been a delay
on your submission being processed by GNATS.
> > As for your question, vacation(1) might need to grow an option for that.
>=20
> Until then, maybe, you guys can use something else? Procmail?
Probably. This is "good enough" when spamc works as expected, though,
so it will go somewhere near the bottom of my pile, I'm afraid.
Ceri
--=20
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
--SvyA5ywaG/v2A5dH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFEGf7tocfcwTS3JF8RAqsyAJ9D7DqlCcfazZ4dF258qhnj5xFYBgCglg7C
Go1BC4LxiUOqAgGY06gxUuo=
=tD0z
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--SvyA5ywaG/v2A5dH--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060317001229.GR36929>