Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:33:08 +0100 From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> To: "Pedro F. Giffuni" <giffunip@tutopia.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) Message-ID: <20090110113308.GA25584@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <61484.71762.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <61484.71762.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 07:22:38PM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: > FWIW, > > I had some informal talk with brooks@ about this at EuroBSDCon: > > - groff(1) needs a C++ compiler so clang is not (yet) an option for the time being we will have to live with GCC or llvm-gcc. I guess once the switch happens we are going to live for some with both gcc and clang/llvm. I also guess that by the time the switch happens clang is going to be full C++ capable :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090110113308.GA25584>