Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2007 01:01:58 +0100 From: Marko Zec <zec@imunes.net> To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netgraph ng_cisco.c Message-ID: <200712010101.59111.zec@imunes.net> In-Reply-To: <20071130233148.Y53707@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> References: <200711302327.lAUNRdV9025350@repoman.freebsd.org> <20071130233148.Y53707@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 01 December 2007 00:34:51 Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2007, Julian Elischer wrote: > > julian 2007-11-30 23:27:39 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > sys/netgraph ng_cisco.c > > Log: > > Add ipv6 to ng_cisco node. ipv6 wasn't a reality when I wrote it.. > > It only hit the FreeBSD tree about 1 month earlier than in6.c did;-) > > I wonder if that should be #ifdef INET6 or what happens for people > not haveing INET6 support in but still being able to configure it? ng_cisco is a pure netgraph node, it only muxes/demuxes data from one HDLC to many protocol-specific hooks and vice versa, i.e. it doesn't interact with protocol-specific code in the network stack at all - that happens in ng_iface to which ng_cisco nodes typically connect to. There's no need / place for #ifdef INET6 in ng_cisco. Marko
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200712010101.59111.zec>