Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 12:48:21 +0300 From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc@crodrigues.org>, Masanori OZAWA <ozawa@ongs.co.jp>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org>, Ed Schouten <ed@fxq.nl>, Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: [ANN] unionfs patchset-19-20070504 release, it is now MPSAFE and transparent mode as default Message-ID: <E1HkdLr-000C5C-Aq@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> In-Reply-To: <20070506093034.GA42976@freebsd.org> References: <E1HkcCT-0004uW-76@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <20070506093034.GA42976@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Hi, > > So far I've tested it under -current, in my diskless env. where > > /etc & /compat/linux are unionfs'ed with a mfs, and so all seems OK. > > there's an XXX in the linuxulator code saying: > > XXX Untested vs. mount -o union; probably does the wrong thing. > > can you confirm that it works ok with unionfs from daichi? > sure, but what/how do you want me to test? danny
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1HkdLr-000C5C-Aq>