Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 17:43:35 -0600 From: luke <lgrady@gmail.com> To: Tim Aslat <tim@spyderweb.com.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is my computer under spec? Message-ID: <5fee5e3004110215435b32188e@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20041102125217.3b188300@bofh.spyderweb.com.au> References: <20041101003519.GI6513@alzatex.com> <1099256318.18712.10.camel@ocean-deep.gldis.ca> <200411010733240766.19A04B72@mail.intradyn.com> <200411020215.28711.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> <20041102125217.3b188300@bofh.spyderweb.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I've managed to use PC133 ram in an older system with no problems, > except I couldn't mix'n'match with the PC100 ram that was already in > there as it caused some interesting instabilities. pc133 will clock down with no instability if both chips are of decent manufacture(kingston, micron, samsung) you can get into problems if you're trying to run pc100 at 133 but even then if you use corsair or mushkin, which are designed to be overclocked you can get by. i have many systems that are thrown together running a mix of pc100, 133, and even ecc 133 and they all run stable, although i'm not overclocking any of the 100, just underclocking the 133(and of course, not using ecc)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5fee5e3004110215435b32188e>