Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2000 15:30:04 -0500 From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/linux/linprocfs linprocfs_misc.c Message-ID: <20001201153004.T559@puck.firepipe.net> In-Reply-To: <xzpbsuwuybf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>; from des@ofug.org on Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:21:24PM %2B0100 References: <200012010634.eB16YKD44700@freefall.freebsd.org> <xzpbsuwuybf.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 01:21:24PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > This code has a maintainer. I also "maintain" make(1) but people are free to commit to it where appropriate. Same thing for any of my ports and addport as well. You need to stop being so damn pedantic about that bit. If every maintainer of the ports tree got up in tight panties about their ports being touched during DISTNAME->PORTNAME/VERSION and other various changes that modified *every single port in the tree*, why, we'd be in bloody hell by now. The point is, private email would accomplish a lot more in your favor, like respect for your code. I think we've discussed this stuff on the lists more than enough in the past, to be quite honest. -- wca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20001201153004.T559>