Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:18:03 +0400 From: Oleg Sharoyko <os@sfedu.ru> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wrong outgoing interface with multiple routing tables Message-ID: <4A6F24BB.7050907@sfedu.ru> In-Reply-To: <4A6F1D76.7040806@elischer.org> References: <1248704237.96833.127.camel@brain.cc.rsu.ru> <4A6DE356.6040006@elischer.org> <4A6DEE30.6000108@sfedu.ru> <4A6DFFA1.1010709@elischer.org> <4A6E0121.2020004@sfedu.ru> <4A6E05EC.8050401@elischer.org> <4A6E0A8B.5000103@sfedu.ru> <4A6E2666.2040906@elischer.org> <4A6E3743.7050708@elischer.org> <1248788292.71222.10.camel@brain.cc.rsu.ru> <4A6F1D76.7040806@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote:
> I'll get that checked in!
Please, also take a look at
_syncache_add() in tcp_syncache.c
There is some code which looks strange, at least at first sight. Won't
bcopy() overwrite assigned value of sc->sc_inc.inc_fibnum ?
/* XXX-BZ this fib assignment is just useless. */
sc->sc_inc.inc_fibnum = inp->inp_inc.inc_fibnum;
bcopy(inc, &sc->sc_inc, sizeof(struct in_conninfo));
--
Oleg
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A6F24BB.7050907>