Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2000 23:15:29 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org> To: Matt Heckaman <matt@ARPA.MAIL.NET> Cc: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, Kenneth Mays <kmays2000@hotmail.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: WU-FTPD Message-ID: <200010080515.XAA02691@harmony.village.org> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 07 Oct 2000 21:09:10 EDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010072109000.98552-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010072109000.98552-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <Pine.BSF.4.21.0010072109000.98552-100000@epsilon.lucida.qc.ca> Matt Heckaman writes: : However, if you need the features that wu-ftpd provide, and want an FTPD : with a good track record, you can check out ProFTPD, which is a lot easier : to use and far more flexible than wu-ftpd. Apache style configureation is : quite nice to use. It's in the ports. :) I wouldn't chose it because of its track record. It has had as many or more security problems that wu-ftpd has had... There's nothing known there now, and it is generally believed to be as secure as wu-ftpd. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200010080515.XAA02691>