Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Mar 2009 18:45:22 +0100 (CET)
From:      Juergen Lock <nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de>
To:        kalinoj1@iem.pw.edu.pl
Cc:        freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: kqemu and devfs - any luck?
Message-ID:  <200903051745.n25HjMvK004963@saturn.kn-bremen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20090305010525.GA69474@volt.iem.pw.edu.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20090305010525.GA69474@volt.iem.pw.edu.pl> you write:
>Hello,
>
>I'm trying to set up kqemu (kqemu-devel from -current) to be accessible to usual
>non-wheel users. I've created a ruleset that looks like this:
>
># devfs rule show    
>100 path kqemu mode 666

Try: path 'kqemu*' ... (kqemu uses device cloning.)

>200 path kqemu unhide
>
 Not sure that works with cloning as expected, at least it doesn't
do anything here...

>than I do 
># devfs rule applyset
>
 That also didn't work here, I did:
	/etc/rc.d/devfs restart

>but sadly my /dev/kqemu are still owned by root:wheel and have 660
>permissions. I'm proceeding exactly in the way that's described in man 8 devfs.
>
>Maybe someone else succeded with this and could give me a tip on how to
>cope with this issue? Or maybe someone can at least confirm that it does
>not work, and the PR should be posted? I'm working on a -CURRENT
>system..

 7-stable here...

 HTH,
	Juergen



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200903051745.n25HjMvK004963>