Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 21:19:47 +0100 From: Daniel Gerzo <danger@FreeBSD.org> To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re[2]: Scheduler in Various Docs Message-ID: <955937027.20080120211947@rulez.sk> In-Reply-To: <47938F21.6020308@math.missouri.edu> References: <479388C0.50507@highperformance.net> <47938F21.6020308@math.missouri.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello Stephen, Sunday, January 20, 2008, 7:12:49 PM, you wrote: > Jason C. Wells wrote: >> The comments regarding SCHED_ULE and SCHED_4BSD are inconsistent with >> information found in the email archives. LINT says ULE is experimental. >> The handbook doesn't mention ULE at all. The archives say ULE is the >> new recommended scheduler. >> >> If ULE is in fact the current recommendation, then a few docs need to be >> updated. > To add to Jason's point - why does GENERIC still default to SCHED_4BSD? Actually, 8.0-CURRENT has the SCHED_ULE scheduler set as default. > Are there plans to change this before 7.0 is truly released? No, this will not be changed for 7.0, but it's planned for 7.1. -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:danger@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?955937027.20080120211947>