Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:41:15 +0200 From: Michal Varga <varga@stonehenge.sk> To: Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Moving to a more recent linux base, when? Message-ID: <1187898075.1341.11.camel@xenon.stonehenge.sk> In-Reply-To: <20070823190157.GA9896@freebsd.org> References: <786602c60708222346s9d45d45o6ff7b362d67fe938@mail.gmail.com> <20070823145000.tr2wulubs484ck0w@webmail.leidinger.net> <20070823190157.GA9896@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 21:01 +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > let me clarify things a little. the 2.6 support in 7-current is good enough. > I am not aware of panics and the only "does not work because of 2.6" program > I know is java which I have sent a patch to kib@ to commit it (so it should > be in before 7.0R) Well, just for the record, Enemy Territory stopped working with 2.6 for me, but I can live with that (Doom 3 runs still fine, for example). On my -CURRENT desktop, I have 2.6 support enabled from the first day of commit and never plan to go back, not just for one game or even Java. >From the perspective of a common everyday desktop user, I'd call current 2.6 support "fine enough", and we are talking about 7.0 that's not even out yet. Anyway, good job, Roman and the rest of the team. Just my two pieces of a random currency. m. -- Michal Varga <varga@stonehenge.sk> Stonehenge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1187898075.1341.11.camel>