Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:46:37 -0800 (PST) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 22140 for review Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0212101045390.28046-100000@root.org> In-Reply-To: <200212101837.gBAIbfqE026165@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 10 Dec 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=22140 > Change 22140 by jhb@jhb_laptop on 2002/12/10 10:37:10 > > Add some hokie code to witness so that if we panic from spinning > too long on a spin lock, we try to use witness info to determine > where the other CPU acquired the lock in question. Would it make sense to leave this code out if WITNESS_SKIPSPIN is enabled? -Nate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe p4-projects" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0212101045390.28046-100000>