Date: 19 Mar 2002 21:13:32 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> Cc: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org>, <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd Makefile Message-ID: <xzpzo1471ub.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <014901c1cf76$776b0f00$d800a8c0@dwcjr> References: <200203191506.g2JF6HW11561@zibbi.icomtek.csir.co.za> <xzp663sege6.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20020319162343.GA44817@hellblazer.nectar.cc> <20020319092330.A72750@dragon.nuxi.com> <20020319182116.GA53863@leviathan.inethouston.net> <xzpelig8lcn.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <014901c1cf76$776b0f00$d800a8c0@dwcjr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net> writes: > Managing the distribution of OpenSSH is split into two teams. One > team does strictly OpenBSD-based development, aiming to produce code > that is as clean, simple, and secure as possible. The other team > takes the clean version and makes it portable, so that it will run > on many operating systems (these are known as the p releases, and > named like "OpenSSH 2.1.1p4"). Please click on the provided link for > your operating system. I've read that, but that's just words on a web page. Please explain exactly what OpenSSH-portable has that "regular" OpenSSH doesn't, and that we need badly enough to justify the pain of switching to -portable. BTW, NetBSD doesn't use OpenSSH-portable either. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzo1471ub.fsf>