Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 21:10:19 +0300 From: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@portaone.com> To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.ORG>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/tools/tools/nanobsd ... Message-ID: <42A9D78B.1000002@portaone.com> In-Reply-To: <p06210266becf5fcd9731@[128.113.24.47]> References: <200504132122.j3DLMKHa089226@repoman.freebsd.org> <p06210266becf5fcd9731@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garance A Drosihn wrote: > Back on April 13/2005, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> >> Modified files: >> tools/tools/nanobsd make.conf >> Log: >> sort and expand the prunelist in a more or less generally sensibly >> order. Put some strategic comments in about how much storage is >> necessary and a longer explanation on the top. >> >> It is now pretty trivial to put nanoBSD on as little as a 64MB >> CF card. > > > Are any macros defined (-D) in CFLAGS when building for nanoBSD, > or other "please make a smaller system" situations? ISTR some > value to check via #ifdef, but now I can't remember what it was > or where I saw it used. IMHO this would be impractical due to likely inter-dependency problems. Practical approach for building "stripped" system is to build normal world, install it and them remove everything you don't need (for example includes, static libs, /rescue etc). -Maxim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42A9D78B.1000002>