Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2009 10:48:42 +0100 (BST) From: "Mark Powell" <M.S.Powell@salford.ac.uk> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kbdmux vs ATA? (was: ATA related panic during ZFS scrub) Message-ID: <20090409104451.D38445@rust.salford.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <grit3p$oem$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20090408170231.K38445@rust.salford.ac.uk> <grit3p$oem$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Ivan Voras wrote: > Hmmm, this shows a lock order problem between ATA and kbdmux's Giant. Ooops. It seems I flunked my 'reading panics' class :( >> / is ufs on USB key > > Are you saying the system has only USB drives or that the ZFS pool was > on the USB drive (or something else)? > > In any case, USB drives do not appear as ATA drives. Sorry. I wasn't clear. I mentioned the usb key, as I've seen other threads reporting zfs corruption with usb. / ufs on usb key Everything else except / is on SATA: /pool raidz1 4x500gb+500gb stripe of 2xSATA drives /pool2 raidz2 6x1tb Cheers. -- Mark Powell - UNIX System Administrator - The University of Salford Information & Learning Services, Clifford Whitworth Building, Salford University, Manchester, M5 4WT, UK. Tel: +44 161 295 6843 Fax: +44 161 295 5888 www.pgp.com for PGP key
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090409104451.D38445>