Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:50:00 GMT
From:      Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
To:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the same
Message-ID:  <201301150250.r0F2o0EY065545@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>
To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, landsidel.allen@gmail.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the
 same
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:46:02 +0200

 There could be variants in terminology, but in fact for most of users
 they are the same. If you have opinion why they should be treated
 differently, please explain it.
 
 -- 
 Alexander Motin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201301150250.r0F2o0EY065545>