Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:50:00 GMT From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the same Message-ID: <201301150250.r0F2o0EY065545@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR bin/166589; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, landsidel.allen@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: bin/166589: atacontrol(8) incorrectly treats RAID10 and 0+1 the same Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 04:46:02 +0200 There could be variants in terminology, but in fact for most of users they are the same. If you have opinion why they should be treated differently, please explain it. -- Alexander Motin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201301150250.r0F2o0EY065545>