Date: 06 Jan 1999 16:32:22 -0500 From: "Robert V. Baron" <rvb@cs.cmu.edu> To: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG, Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>, Andrzej Bialecki <abial@nask.pl> Subject: Re: /boot/boot.rc && /boot/rc.d Message-ID: <yzs1zl8140p.fsf@sicily.odyssey.cs.cmu.edu> In-Reply-To: "Daniel C. Sobral"'s message of Wed, 06 Jan 1999 03:18:40 %2B0900 References: <36925780.75AB6581@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> writes: > I was thinking about possible on-comings "patches" in boot.rc > (currently known as boot.conf :), when I realized that for > third-party drivers or ports making use of loader it would better to > source files from a boot/rc.d directory. I was wondering whether boot.rc should be named loader.rc. It seems to me that /boot.config has to hang around for a while to set flags for boot2. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yzs1zl8140p.fsf>