Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 13:25:21 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: d@delphij.net Cc: Xin LI <delphij@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/vuxml vuln.xml Message-ID: <4EC6CD41.5030800@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4EC6CC52.5060002@delphij.net> References: <201111182020.pAIKKRbG033264@repoman.freebsd.org> <4EC6BEA5.1080504@FreeBSD.org> <4EC6CC52.5060002@delphij.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/18/2011 13:21, Xin LI wrote: > On 11/18/11 12:23, Doug Barton wrote: >> On 11/18/2011 12:20, Xin LI wrote: >>> delphij 2011-11-18 20:20:27 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>> Modified files: security/vuxml vuln.xml Log: Bump modified >>> date for previous commit. > >> I purposely did not do that because there was no material >> modification to the entry. The previous URL still works, and both >> have the same data. > > Changing URL requires bump of modification date, which serves as a > flag for downstream consumers to re-render the item's result object. > Without the bump, the URL would only be updated until a full rebuild > is done. ... right ... and since the old URL is still valid, I didn't see the need to force that. Just sayin' ... -- "We could put the whole Internet into a book." "Too practical." Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EC6CD41.5030800>