Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:49:57 +0400 From: S4mmael <s4mmael@gmail.com> To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: FreeBSD vs Ubuntu - Discuss... Message-ID: <6e38aed80909300449p24928d25v2a34d24f309fa808@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <6e38aed80909300449h61d671a3i2281eb875f649eb6@mail.gmail.com> References: <200909290226.CAA28246@sopwith.solgatos.com> <689d500ec8c95542a53440b8a23ae773@mail.liquidphlux.com> <6e38aed80909300449h61d671a3i2281eb875f649eb6@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Since the article says that they left the debugging features on I think > this has a bit to do with it. Obviously the testers didn't care to read the > documentation, and didn't seem to care to use the same compiler which is > available in ports, I believe it is safe to chuck this lame benchmark. What about FreeBSD 7.2? All debug featureas are 100% off in this version, but test results are the same as in 8.0 Besides, UFS is known to be not the fastest FS. So, there is no reason to be suprised.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?6e38aed80909300449p24928d25v2a34d24f309fa808>