Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> To: Takayoshi Kochi <kochi@netbsd.org> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2267] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree Message-ID: <20030528105853.M8236@root.org> In-Reply-To: <20030529.012349.68555656.kochi@netbsd.org> References: <20030527140327.E6550@root.org> <20030528071116.2db41659.yosimoto@waishi.jp> <20030529.012349.68555656.kochi@netbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote: > I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed > in recent ACPI CA, but at least you should remove all TABLE_ID_DSDT's, > I think. > > Also, ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID should be larger than 0, > otherwise 0 may be allocated to running method and make a conflict. > > I've made a diff against NetBSD-current and just booted the kernel, > but haven't tested much (and still trying to make out what the > changes are intended). > > Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with > some appropriate option. Thank you for the patch. Since we are only days away from a release, I would like to avoid using the new dynamic ID allocation code and instead stick to hard-coding the defaults. This is the safer way for 5.1R. We will do a new import and more fixes after the release. -Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030528105853.M8236>