Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 28 May 2003 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To:        Takayoshi Kochi <kochi@netbsd.org>
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: [acpi-jp 2267] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree
Message-ID:  <20030528105853.M8236@root.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030529.012349.68555656.kochi@netbsd.org>
References:  <20030527140327.E6550@root.org> <20030528071116.2db41659.yosimoto@waishi.jp> <20030529.012349.68555656.kochi@netbsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote:
> I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed
> in recent ACPI CA, but at least you should remove all TABLE_ID_DSDT's,
> I think.
>
> Also, ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID should be larger than 0,
> otherwise 0 may be allocated to running method and make a conflict.
>
> I've made a diff against NetBSD-current and just booted the kernel,
> but haven't tested much (and still trying to make out what the
> changes are intended).
>
> Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with
> some appropriate option.

Thank you for the patch.  Since we are only days away from a release, I
would like to avoid using the new dynamic ID allocation code and instead
stick to hard-coding the defaults.  This is the safer way for 5.1R.  We
will do a new import and more fixes after the release.

-Nate



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030528105853.M8236>