Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 15:22:03 +0200 From: George Kontostanos <gkontos.mail@gmail.com> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=D6zkan_KIRIK?= <ozkan.kirik@gmail.com>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=F8rgrav?= <des@freebsd.org>, Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 Beta2 /etc/rc.d/named script and /etc/defaults/rc.conf Message-ID: <CA%2BdUSyp5JWskKU7_oMxuTsZekimtRs2A%2BmEZm=kS-87jNjF9yQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20131104163457.GJ52889@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAAcX-AFJ__4CDz7%2BabFoRf%2BecrfOZRFXaos1sYnb85=k_BweEw@mail.gmail.com> <20131103220654.GU52889@FreeBSD.org> <6AA4A8E1-CBCE-4C87-A320-BB08EC76715F@lassitu.de> <CA%2BdUSypfj5Ja%2BKi1tikG19na7Dv96foW3HE%2BTEPaNYOUM9r5Cw@mail.gmail.com> <20131104083443.GZ52889@FreeBSD.org> <2B21E123-23BA-4E07-B9DD-9DE1CDE40D08@FreeBSD.org> <20131104163457.GJ52889@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:11:02PM +0100, Erwin Lansing wrote: > E> > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 01:41:01AM +0200, George Kontostanos wrote: > E> > G> > Am 03.11.2013 um 23:06 schrieb Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.o= rg > >: > E> > G> > > E> > G> > > On Sun, Nov 03, 2013 at 10:05:02PM +0200, =D6zkan KIRIK wrote= : > E> > G> > > =D6> Altough bind removed from FreeBSD 10 distribution, > "/etc/rc.d/named" > E> > G> > script > E> > G> > > =D6> still exists. > E> > G> > > =D6> and this script depends on "/etc/mtree/BIND.chroot.dist" > file but > E> > G> > there is > E> > G> > > =D6> no such file in source tree. > E> > G> > > =D6> I think this file was forgotten to be removed. > E> > G> > > =D6> > E> > G> > > =D6> And also, named_* definitions still exists in > /etc/defaults/rc.conf > E> > G> > file. > E> > G> > > > E> > G> > > Please review attached file that removes named from /etc. > E> > G> > > E> > G> > It would be great if the port would learn to install its own > script etc. > E> > G> > in time for that change. (Unless it=92s already there, and I=92= m > just too blind > E> > G> > to see it.) > E> > G> > E> > G> No you are not blind. Installing bind from ports still relies on > the > E> > G> /etc/rc.d/named script. > E> > > E> > Erwin, can you please handle that? > E> > E> Things are much worse that this, the ports are completely written unde= r > the assumption that there is a Bind in base, which of course would alread= y > break with WITHOUT_BIND before Bind was completely removed. It will be > hard to fix without breaking the installed base of 8 and 9. Sigh. > E> > E> I'll try to work on it this week, but unfortunately have a full > schedule of meetings and travel as well. > Suggestion. An option to install the rc script would solve that problem. > > What should we do with src? > > IMO, we should proceed with removal of remnants of bind in src. In the > worst case, > if you can't handle it this week, the situation will be the following: > > 1) 8.x, 9.x users are okay > 2) 10+.x users w/o bind are okay > 3) 10+.x users with bind have problems > > If we skip updating src, then situation would be: > > 1) 8.x, 9.x users are okay > 2) 10+.x users w/o bind have problems > 3) 10+.x users with bind are okay > > I think, there are less 10.x users with bind, than 10.x without it. > > Please warn about this in UPDATING. I am personally use 12 FreeBSD servers as dedicated DNS servers only. > -- > Totus tuus, Glebius. > --=20 George Kontostanos --- http://www.aisecure.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BdUSyp5JWskKU7_oMxuTsZekimtRs2A%2BmEZm=kS-87jNjF9yQ>