Date: Fri, 25 Jun 1999 09:44:16 -0700 (PDT) From: <jfesler@gigo.com> To: Stuart Henderson <stuart@eclipse.net.uk> Cc: Mark Conway Wirt <mark@intrepid.net>, Bryan Bunch <bryanb@walls-media.com>, "Mike Avery (on the road)" <mavery@mail.otherwhen.com>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why not uucp, instead of smtp and static ip? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9906250942590.14904-100000@heaven.gigo.com> In-Reply-To: <3773B194.BAC2F717@eclipse.net.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Exchange doesn't even let you use ETRN if you use an ISDN router. Somebody (can't remember who off hand) made a "etrn.exe" for windows. It didn't care what mail program you ran or anything else. It simply asked for etrn. Our on-demand ISDN users used it as an event; the network traffic caused the routers to dial automaticly. It worked well for them, regardless of whether it was exchange, notes, or whatever other hoaky excuse for smtp they had... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9906250942590.14904-100000>