Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:28:29 +0100
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Many processes stuck in zfs
Message-ID:  <hnaum5$akv$1@dough.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <20100311150933.18276bypviae5mw4@webmail.leidinger.net>
References:  <864468D4-DCE9-493B-9280-00E5FAB2A05C@lassitu.de>	<20100309122954.GE3155@garage.freebsd.pl>	<EC9BC6B4-8D0E-4FE3-852F-0E3A24569D33@sarenet.es>	<20100309125815.GF3155@garage.freebsd.pl>	<CB854F58-03AF-46DD-8153-85FA96037C21@sarenet.es>	<BFF1E2D6-B48A-4A5E-ACEE-8577FDB07820@sarenet.es>	<20100310110202.GA1715@garage.freebsd.pl>	<E04F91AA-B2C4-4166-A24A-74F1BEF01519@sarenet.es>	<20100310173143.GD1715@garage.freebsd.pl>	<20100311084527.2934034895hvgxaw@webmail.leidinger.net>	<764BD545-B86C-47DC-9004-964EB2216AF0@sarenet.es>	<hnaide$r8h$1@dough.gmane.org> <20100311150933.18276bypviae5mw4@webmail.leidinger.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 03/11/10 15:09, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> Quoting Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> (from Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:59:01
> +0100):
>
>> On 03/11/10 09:54, Borja Marcos wrote:
>>
>> I don't know about the rest but this:
>>
>>> CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU L5420 @ 2.50GHz (2496.25-MHz K8-class CPU)
>>
>> does not agree with this:
>>
>>> FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 8 core(s)
>>
>> The Xeon 54xx series does not come in 8 core packages. Either it is
>> 2xquad-core or a Xeon 55xx.
>
> Can also be a problem in the layout detection logic...

Not likely, because the 54xx family is very wide spread and nothing 
special with regards to its topology. It also has the same topology as 
53xx. These are systems limited to two physical sockets, each of which 
can have a single, dual or a quad core CPU and the 5xxx motherboards 
accept all CPUs from series 50xx, 51xx, 52xx, 53xx, 54xx. In short - 
these are very, very common systems.

My guess would be that someone, somewhere is lying - I don't know if 
CPUID can be (wrongly) updated by microcode, for example, or if the 
mptable can be corrupted in a way to represent two physical (socketed) 
CPUs as one.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?hnaum5$akv$1>