Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:16:58 -0500 (CDT)
From:      "Sean C. Farley" <scf@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Michal Varga <varga@stonehenge.sk>
Cc:        emulation@FreeBSD.org, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: Moving to a more recent linux base, when?
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.0.999.0708231514100.3057@baba.farley.org>
In-Reply-To: <1187898075.1341.11.camel@xenon.stonehenge.sk>
References:  <786602c60708222346s9d45d45o6ff7b362d67fe938@mail.gmail.com> <20070823145000.tr2wulubs484ck0w@webmail.leidinger.net> <20070823190157.GA9896@freebsd.org> <1187898075.1341.11.camel@xenon.stonehenge.sk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Aug 2007, Michal Varga wrote:

> On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 21:01 +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
>
>> let me clarify things a little. the 2.6 support in 7-current is good
>> enough.  I am not aware of panics and the only "does not work because
>> of 2.6" program I know is java which I have sent a patch to kib@ to
>> commit it (so it should be in before 7.0R)
>
> Well, just for the record, Enemy Territory stopped working with 2.6
> for me, but I can live with that (Doom 3 runs still fine, for
> example). On my -CURRENT desktop, I have 2.6 support enabled from the
> first day of commit and never plan to go back, not just for one game
> or even Java.  From the perspective of a common everyday desktop user,
> I'd call current 2.6 support "fine enough", and we are talking about
> 7.0 that's not even out yet. Anyway, good job, Roman and the rest of
> the team.

Out of curiosity, would setting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.2 allow Enemy
Territory to work on -CURRENT?

Sean
-- 
scf@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.0.999.0708231514100.3057>