Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 10:39:28 -0500 From: Rick Miller <vmiller@hostileadmin.com> To: Dale Scott <dalescott@shaw.ca> Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 + Apache + PHP Message-ID: <CAHzLAVGC=Jbmg-Pqv1x%2BSdE9gcBFFR7zC5R6H2T-_V==Lp61jA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <15A20437-032F-421D-BF2A-503E71F63E70@shaw.ca> References: <CAHzLAVHoiRRg2kN2xc-KSNKrYjScmHctGKFk9tAnxEJ-rxKQbA@mail.gmail.com> <15A20437-032F-421D-BF2A-503E71F63E70@shaw.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Dale Scott <dalescott@shaw.ca> wrote: > So far as I am aware, php5 must be built from ports only if you need to > build mod_php for apache. If you use php-fpm with apache you can use binary > packages for everything. I'm trying to work through a packages-only system > with nginx, php, php extensions, and MariaDB/MySQL) all installed using > binary packages. I'm hoping that using pkg to upgrade binary packages will > be a huge time savings over "postmaster -af", but the critical thing (from > what I've read) is to have a 100% binary packages system (with absolutely > nothing from ports). > > Certainly it has been shown hybrid solutions are possible, but I'd rather > be a dumb user and spend more time on app dev. I had hoped that I could install mod_php (or at least the shared objects in libexec/apache/) via package, without having to resort to ports. I too want to manage hosts exclusively with binary packages. In the absence of a working a Poudriere implementation, it appears I will have to install it via ports. :( Thanks for the info. -- Take care Rick Miller
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHzLAVGC=Jbmg-Pqv1x%2BSdE9gcBFFR7zC5R6H2T-_V==Lp61jA>