Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:38:39 GMT From: Mikael Vidstedt<mikael.vidstedt@bea.com> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: misc/112591: Non-monitored locks are dummy-implemented Message-ID: <200705110838.l4B8cdMi082221@www.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <200705110850.l4B8o35r027756@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 112591 >Category: misc >Synopsis: Non-monitored locks are dummy-implemented >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Fri May 11 08:50:03 GMT 2007 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Mikael Vidstedt >Release: 6.2 >Organization: BEA Systems, Inc. >Environment: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 12 10:40:27 UTC 2007 root@dessler.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 >Description: As far as I can tell, the implementation of the NLMPROC4_NM_LOCK RPC procedure is not correctly implemented. It looks like it always returns "granted" regardless of the actual locking state of the file handle. If a full implementation is not possible, I would at least say that returning "denied" is a better implementation, since "granted" may lead to data corruption. >How-To-Repeat: - >Fix: - >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200705110838.l4B8cdMi082221>