Date: Thu, 5 Jul 2001 12:26:48 -0500 From: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_synch.c Message-ID: <20010705122647.K371@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20010704160401.A42306@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 04:04:02PM -0700 References: <20010704105848.K1438@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> <XFMail.010704134410.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20010704173943.C296@sydney.worldwide.lemis.com> <20010704160401.A42306@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday, 4 July 2001 at 16:04:02 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Wed, Jul 04, 2001 at 05:39:43PM -0500, Greg Lehey wrote: >> On Wednesday, 4 July 2001 at 13:44:10 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >>> >>> On 04-Jul-01 Greg Lehey wrote: >>>> On Tuesday, 3 July 2001 at 0:53:35 -0700, John Baldwin wrote: >>>>> jhb 2001/07/03 00:53:35 PDT >>>>> >>>>> Modified files: >>>>> sys/kern kern_synch.c >>>>> Log: >>>>> Axe spl's that are covered by the sched_lock (and have been for quite >>>>> some time.) >>>> >>>> I still get very confused when people talk about spls in -CURRENT. >>> >>> They are still there even if they are stub functions. I'm just axeing some of >>> the stubs that have been fully replaced. >> >> OK, I can see the point if this is code which can be MFCd. But by the >> looks of it this isn't the case here. So what good does it do? > > You'd prefer we left the NOP code in the tree until the end of time? I'm not sure if you understand. That's what this commit does, sort of. I'm just wondering why. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010705122647.K371>