Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 13:05:55 -0500 From: Mike Horwath <drechsau@Geeks.ORG> To: Robert Joosten <robert@ml.erje.net> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance 4.x vs. 6.x Message-ID: <20061014180555.GB75972@Geeks.ORG> In-Reply-To: <20061014162222.GB716@iphouse.com> References: <20061014130331.68863.qmail@web33312.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <200610141113.25155.tec@mega.net.br> <20061014153813.GC72440@Geeks.ORG> <200610141313.28868.tec@mega.net.br> <20061014162222.GB716@iphouse.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Oct 14, 2006 at 06:22:23PM +0200, Robert Joosten wrote: > Hi, > > > but I tell you that a 10K Raptor is faster then a 15K 320Mb SCSI when > > compiling world or untarring large files. > > Well, put that '10K Raptor' in a loaded fileserver and compare it > with a SCSI thing. Most scsi implementations I know are much more > scalable when there's a realworld load sucking it till death. Try it > ;-) Shhh... > Have a great weekend y'all. yahyah, I concur. -- Mike Horwath, reachable via drechsau@Geeks.ORG
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061014180555.GB75972>