Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:44:15 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams) Cc: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>, Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, "Rodney W. Grimes" <freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday Message-ID: <10834.956522655@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 23 Apr 2000 13:47:35 MDT." <200004231947.NAA08296@nomad.yogotech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I was under the impression that 4.x hasn't been designated as the stable > branch (yet). FreeBSD usw3.freebsd.org 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #0: Fri Apr 7 01:09:21 CDT 2000 root@usw3.freebsd.org:/usr/src/sys/compile/USW3 i386 If it hasn't been designated stable yet, then a lot of people are being confused every time they run uname(1). :-) It's -stable now. Probably more -stable than 3.x if you look at some people's experiences in the field. :) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?10834.956522655>