Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 04 Jan 2008 20:44:42 +0200
From:      Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org>
To:        "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        perforce@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: PERFORCE change 132497 for review
Message-ID:  <477E7E9A.9060400@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080104.111926.-108774279.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <200801041711.m04HBGPG029002@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080104.111926.-108774279.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <200801041711.m04HBGPG029002@repoman.freebsd.org>
>             Oleksandr Tymoshenko <gonzo@freebsd.org> writes:
> : http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=132497
> : 
> : Change 132497 by gonzo@gonzo_jeeves on 2008/01/04 17:11:07
> : 
> : 	o I believe MK_ZFS is more appropriate variable to be checked
> : 	    in this case.
> 
> I thought this was more a case of 'exclude all CDDL code' rather than
> being tied to ZFS.
     This particular case is strictly ZFS-related. Also, WITHOUT_CDDL implies
WITHOUT_ZFS in bsd.own.mk, so it's just more precise check.

-- 
gonzo



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?477E7E9A.9060400>