Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Jan 2002 16:46:34 -0500 (EST)
From:      Joe Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To:        Steven Farmer <steve@megahack.com>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Should /sbin/mount_smbfs be static?
Message-ID:  <20020111164558.P80091-100000@shumai.marcuscom.com>
In-Reply-To: <15423.22138.622826.566389@catbert.megahack.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Steven Farmer wrote:

> Is it ok for /sbin/mount_smbfs to be dynamically linked?  Just
> wondering, since I noticed that it's the only thing /sbin that is:

IMHO, it should be statically linked, even though if all hell breaks
loose, the chance you'll be using mount_smbfs to fix the system are slim.

Joe

>
> [catbert] ~> uname -a
> FreeBSD catbert.megahack.com 4.5-RC FreeBSD 4.5-RC #0: Fri Jan 11 12:32:22 CST 2002     steve@catbert.megahack.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CATBERT  i386
> [catbert] ~> file /sbin/mount_smbfs
> /sbin/mount_smbfs: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386, version 1 (FreeBSD), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), stripped
> [catbert] ~> ldd /sbin/mount_smbfs
> /sbin/mount_smbfs:
> 	libsmb.so.1 => /usr/lib/libsmb.so.1 (0x28066000)
> 	libc.so.4 => /usr/lib/libc.so.4 (0x28071000)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020111164558.P80091-100000>