Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2010 19:40:17 -0800 From: Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> To: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> Subject: Re: Bug about sched_4bsd? Message-ID: <20100118034017.GA71183@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <3bbf2fe11001171859h278b7e74p898d219697e3802e@mail.gmail.com> References: <20100117.142200.321689433999177718.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> <20100117.152835.119882392487126976.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> <20100117195838.GA69278@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <3bbf2fe11001171859h278b7e74p898d219697e3802e@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 03:59:52AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: > 2010/1/17 Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>: > > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 03:28:35PM +0900, Kohji Okuno wrote: > >> > >> Could you check sched_4bsd.patch, please? > >> > > > > Kohji, > > > > I do not have the proper skills to evaluate your patch. > > Hopefully, one of the scheduler gurus can read over > > your analysis and patch, because I use the 4BSD scheduler > > on all my systems due to ULE's poor performance. > > Did you fill any PR with datas or mailed MLs? If yes, can you point to > the e-mail reports/PR you did? > I have communicated directly with Jeff about the problem. There are also emails to freebsd-current about the issue [1]. In fact, I setup one of the nodes on my cluster to given Jeff root access. Unfortunately, Jeff like many others including myself have limited time. [1] http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=199808+0+archive/2009/freebsd-current/20091018.freebsd-current -- Steve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100118034017.GA71183>