Date: Thu, 6 Nov 1997 11:34:58 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: John Fieber <jfieber@indiana.edu> Cc: Brandon Gillespie <brandon@roguetrader.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NetAtalk doesn't work!? take two Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.971106113047.2954E-100000@current1.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.971106132519.405A-100000@fallout.campusview.indiana.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 6 Nov 1997, John Fieber wrote: > On Wed, 5 Nov 1997, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > did you read the 2.2.5 errata? > > After upgrading the netatalk stuff, I get a whole pile of: > > ddp_route: still have no valid route but, does it WORK? > > messages on the console when booting and before atalkd is > started. Is that a serious problem or could I comment the printf > and ignore it? if it works, then yes. I still have work to do here.. > > Completely unrelated to recent netatalk changes, when atalkd > runs, it installs around 600 routes. Since I know next to > nothing about appletalk, I'm wondering, is normal? possibly. what are they.. it might for example install up to 32 routes for a local ethernet (netranges don't fit into the'netmask' way of doing things very well) and there could be similar things for other remote nets. think.. how would you describe a netrange 10 100-110, using netmasks? you end up having to install several adjacent binary ranges to make up that range.. > > Thanks, > > -john > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.95.971106113047.2954E-100000>