Date: Sat, 7 May 2016 09:27:54 +0200 From: Ben Woods <woodsb02@gmail.com> To: Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> Cc: "freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org" <freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS and PkgBase Message-ID: <CAOc73CACQUhx2rGuC1ftcpuk=LeOv8fEpnR0A2PPRGVo31RYRg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20160506221151.GN1362@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAOc73CC6WoFHPDBa6LGMyhmnA1ZjiemffyTJBGBNSZwPOu8KzA@mail.gmail.com> <20160506221151.GN1362@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday, 7 May 2016, Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> With 'installkernel', the first kernel listed in KERNCONF is installed
> as the default (/boot/kernel), and subsequent kernels are installed with
> the kernel name included in the path (/boot/kernel.${INSTKERNNAME}). In
> both cases (source-based upgrades and with pkgbase), the behavior will
> remain the same.
>
> Glen
>
Hi Glen,
With the recent commit mentioned previously, only the first kernel listed
in KERNCONF is installed unless make.conf contains the following line:
NO_INSTALLEXTRAKERNELS=no
This affects both source-based upgrades (make installkernel) and package
building (make packages).
Is this the desired behaviour?
Regards,
Ben
--
--
From: Benjamin Woods
woodsb02@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOc73CACQUhx2rGuC1ftcpuk=LeOv8fEpnR0A2PPRGVo31RYRg>