Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 09 Aug 2013 21:24:13 +0300
From:      Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org>
To:        obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r253996 - in head: . sys/cddl/compat/opensolaris/sys sys/cddl/dev/dtrace sys/conf sys/modules/cyclic sys/modules/dtrace/dtio sys/modules/dtrace/dtmalloc sys/modules/dtrace/dtnfscl sys/m...
Message-ID:  <520533CD.6030109@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130809154829.GA12485@dragon.NUXI.org>
References:  <201308061551.r76FpuY7056153@svn.freebsd.org> <20130809154829.GA12485@dragon.NUXI.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 09/08/2013 18:48 David O'Brien said the following:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2013 at 03:51:56PM +0000, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Log:
> ..
>>   Also, meaning of DEBUG was overloaded to enable WITNESS support for some
>>   OpenSolaris (primarily ZFS) locks.  Now this overloading is removed and
>>   that use of DEBUG is replaced with a new option OPENSOLARIS_WITNESS.
> 
> You state there is little value in witness tracking for ZFS in UPDATING.

That's not completely true.  If there is a new report then it deserves
attention.  The problem is that there are just too many reports.  So probably
only someone hacking on ZFS and knowing where to look / what to suspect can
benefit from OPENSOLARIS_WITNESS.

> Is there no reasonable way to gain useful lock tracking for ZFS?

Honestly - I don't know.

> At a minimum, shouldn't this also be added to sys/conf/NOTES in the
> "# SMP Debugging Options:" section?

This commit has not changed status quo.
But what you suggest does make sense.

-- 
Andriy Gapon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?520533CD.6030109>