Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 01:26:35 +0200 From: "Oldach, Helge" <Helge.Oldach@atosorigin.com> To: "'Bjoern Koenig'" <bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de>, "'Allan Fields'" <bsd@afields.ca> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: nullfs in 4.10 Message-ID: <D2CFC58E0F8CB443B54BE72201E8916E94CC24@dehhx005.hbg.de.int.atosorigin.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Bjoern Koenig > > NFS on localhost instead of nullfs is a very > good solution. Err, no, the overhead is *much* higher than plain nullfs or unionfs. Local NFS is essentially fiddling file system access through the networking subsystem. Helge
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D2CFC58E0F8CB443B54BE72201E8916E94CC24>