Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 21:42:35 +0900 From: Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <shino@fornext.org> To: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re[2]: kern/125003: incorrect EtherIP header format. Message-ID: <20080626192225.9813.A2D40D1E@fornext.org> In-Reply-To: <20080626.173915.115767618.hrs@allbsd.org> References: <200806260820.m5Q8K40p017875@freefall.freebsd.org> <20080626.173915.115767618.hrs@allbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Hiroki-san, > I do not think our current implementation has interoperability issue > here because eip_ver is always used with ETHER_IP_VER_*_MASK. Could > you please elaborate more specific case? First of all, my fix last submitted was wrong way to solve the problem that I noticed. In current implementation, 0x03 is transmitted, and, next, 0x00 is transmitted as version(3) and reserved(0x000) field. But I think that 0x30 should be transmitted first from RFC3378. -- Shunsuke SHINOMIYA <shino@fornext.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20080626192225.9813.A2D40D1E>