Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 28 May 1998 17:06:44 -0700 (PDT)
From:      "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
To:        djv@bedford.net
Cc:        alk@pobox.com, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Better luck with PPro 166 or 180 at 200 MHz?
Message-ID:  <199805290006.RAA29237@hub.freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <199805282231.SAA04504@lucy.bedford.net> from CyberPeasant at "May 28, 98 06:31:17 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
CyberPeasant wrote:
> Tony Kimball wrote:
> > 
> > I'm trying to decide whether to get a pair of 166 or 180 MHz PPro's.
> > Which has a better probability of running at 200MHz, a pair of
> > 166MHz 512k cache, or a pair of 180MHz 256k cache?
> > 
> A pair of 200MHz running at 200MHz is your best bet :)
> (Sorry, couldn't resist.)

	i would have guessed two PPro 166MHz 512kB cache overclocked.
	arent these chips supposed to be wonderful for overclocking.
	the doubled cache must be worth more than the 20% increase
	in clock rate.
jmb

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hardware" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199805290006.RAA29237>