Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:32:13 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> To: Bruce M Simpson <bms@spc.org> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: My planned work on networking stack Message-ID: <40449AED.1A4580E5@freebsd.org> References: <4043B6BA.B847F081@freebsd.org> <200403011507.52238.wes@softweyr.com> <20040302031625.GA4061@scylla.towardex.com> <20040302042957.GH3841@saboteur.dek.spc.org> <20040302082625.GE22985@cell.sick.ru> <20040302084321.GA21729@xor.obsecurity.org> <20040302085556.GA23734@cell.sick.ru> <20040302092825.GD884@saboteur.dek.spc.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce M Simpson wrote: > > However, not including an OSPF/BGP daemon doesn't preclude us from ensuring > that APIs which are exposed for advanced routing functionality (multipath, > etc) do the right thing across the board, are well defined, etc. > > As to the second part of your mail: That sounds like a reasonable suggestion, > I am sure Andre and others are paying attention to this and will take it on > board when an implementation is nearer. Yes, exactly! -- Andre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40449AED.1A4580E5>