Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:11:33 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Instead of freebsd.com, why not... Message-ID: <155315779.20050215071133@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <33A6E066-7F17-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net> References: <20050213152331.2B00E16A4D1@hub.freebsd.org> <F64CC038-7EEE-11D9-B357-000D93C7878E@illusionart.com> <1722947768.20050215023424@wanadoo.fr> <BD1E0D37-7EF2-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net> <1497115560.20050215024836@wanadoo.fr> <06433BF9-7EF5-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net> <8310509120.20050215063232@wanadoo.fr> <33A6E066-7F17-11D9-B134-000D933E3CEC@shire.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC writes: > no they did and could point out specific problems and likely > intentional changes. Where can I see a list of these? > Google on this issue of Windows IE standard compliance, especially with > CSS. You will find reams of info with examples of where MS got it > wrong, and many think intentionally got it wrong. I've already tested the browser myself, with the official test suites. It did better than any other overall. In any case, MSIE doesn't run on FreeBSD. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?155315779.20050215071133>