Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 09:51:33 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> To: Remko Lodder <remko@elvandar.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils/nvclock/files patch-src::Makefile.in Message-ID: <20100911095133.GA98291@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <2FE6FEAD-AEC7-47B3-BF09-7058908F3D42@elvandar.org> References: <201009110907.o8B97h9o041593@repoman.freebsd.org> <2FE6FEAD-AEC7-47B3-BF09-7058908F3D42@elvandar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:33:20AM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote: > On Sep 11, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > > > Closes PR: ports/149434 > > We refer to this as > > PR: <category>/<number> In most cases, yes, absolutely, but: The committed patch was not from the PR; submitter suggested marking the port as jobs-unsafe (and I hate marking ports unsafe or broken instead of properly fixing them). Technically, I could have omitted any attribution whatsoever, but decided to do it nonetheless (making clear that commit merely closes the PR, not taking any code/idea from it). Thanks for asking though. ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100911095133.GA98291>