Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 May 2007 11:41:13 -0600
From:      Elliot Finley <efinley@efinley.com>
To:        Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS the perfect FS?  if only...
Message-ID:  <qja94352hc2o9r15b7fnmvlfk86ums6m4o@4ax.com>
In-Reply-To: <f2057n$uhn$1@sea.gmane.org>
References:  <cbi6431a042bfp601o08c5pp7abbqmpm54@4ax.com> <f2057n$uhn$1@sea.gmane.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 11 May 2007 00:09:52 +0200, you wrote:

>Elliot Finley wrote:
>> If you could start with a 3 drive zraid2 as the underlying pool
>> storage and later add drives to the existing zraid2 as space was
>> needed, then ZFS would be the ultimate FS (at least for me).
>>=20
>> Any takers?  How hard would this be?
>
>Isn't zraid2 like RAID6, e.g. includes 2 "parity" components? How do you
>propose to redistribute the parity blocks after a disk is included in
>already functioning RAID5 or RAID6 volume?
>
>(hint: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RAID5#RAID_5)

The new 3Ware cards do Online Capacity expansion.  So it's obviously
not impossible.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?qja94352hc2o9r15b7fnmvlfk86ums6m4o>