Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2002 13:08:00 -0400 (EDT) From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@pcnet1.pcnet.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Neal Fachan <neal@isilon.com>, Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, Garrett Wollman <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>, Jonathan Lemon <jlemon@flugsvamp.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: additional queue macro Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10207041302130.10479-100000@pcnet1.pcnet.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0207040836270.6975-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > that was teh plan... we're just discussing the name.. > TAILQ_FOREACH_SAFE ? Oh, I thought the initial proposal was to add a _new_ interface that allowed safe removals while traversing the list (and allow the existing macros to be changed for debugging purposes/extra sanity checks). -- Dan Eischen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.GSO.4.10.10207041302130.10479-100000>