Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:22:29 -0400 From: Chuck Swiger <cswiger@mac.com> To: Andy Fawcett <andy@athame.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GCC 4.0 [Re: FreeBSD 6 is coming too fast] Message-ID: <426EA305.9010400@mac.com> In-Reply-To: <200504261338.01026.andy@athame.co.uk> References: <20050425010242.GA44110@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050425182033.GC40370@xor.obsecurity.org> <p0621020cbe930300304b@[128.113.24.47]> <200504261338.01026.andy@athame.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andy Fawcett wrote: > On Monday 25 April 2005 23:28, Garance A Drosihn wrote: [ ... ] >> I'm not saying that we should switch to it because of that, but I'm >> just mentioning it as an interesting data point (assuming it is true!). > > FYI, the KDE project just blacklisted gcc 4.0.0, because "it is known to > miscompile KDE. Please use a newer version, or if that is not yet available, > choose an older version." > > No, I don't know what the exact problems are, but they are obviously severe > enough for KDE to say "no thanks" to 4.0.0. Note that the KDE project also says "no thanks" to organizing their software correctly enough that portupgrade works.... -- -Chuck
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?426EA305.9010400>