Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 10:02:46 -0800 (PST) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Brad Knowles <blk@skynet.be>, FreeBSD-CURRENT Mailing List <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: INVARIANTS doesn't work? Message-ID: <200003241802.KAA14776@apollo.backplane.com> References: <v04220808b5000473e2bd@[195.238.1.121]> <200003231745.JAA02103@apollo.backplane.com> <20000324094127.C1349@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:Is there any good reason why we have two different options if they can
:only be used together?
:
:Greg
I think it's so you can compile a kernel with INVARIANT_SUPPORT in
in order to support dynamic load modules which may have been compiled
with INVARIANTS.
-Matt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200003241802.KAA14776>