Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 22:38:05 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org> To: Peter Jeremy <PeterJeremy@optushome.com.au> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, delphij@delphij.net, developers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it feasible to cross-build compat5x binary? Message-ID: <20051027193805.GT68470@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20051024080811.GF39882@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> References: <20051023105230.GA55181@frontfree.net> <20051023232935.GC602@dragon.NUXI.org> <20051024080811.GF39882@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--GMArzDD+OGn24EFp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 06:08:11PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On Sun, 2005-Oct-23 16:29:35 -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > >We should no trust cross built libraries for this purpose at this time. > >We really don't know how identical the results will be to being natively > >built. >=20 > At some stage, we need to validate our cross-build chain with cmp(1). > We can probably leverage off the work that NetBSD has done in this > area. This would significantly simplify the work involved in supporting > the various architectures. >=20 This has already been and being done. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --GMArzDD+OGn24EFp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDYSydqRfpzJluFF4RAlGHAJ0XWdbFI0gMKKMKdFKNFr+DwNVHBgCeN7yn 9CCYgAg/vIBTzJPqhdXAymY= =8JEs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GMArzDD+OGn24EFp--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051027193805.GT68470>